In our previous blogs, we explored AlphaLISA and HTRF in detail, highlighting their unique strengths. Both advanced assay technologies offer exceptional sensitivity and are well-suited for high-throughput screening, making them both reliable methods for detecting biomolecules and studying molecular interactions. While they share some key features, each method has its own distinct advantages that make it a great choice depending on your specific needs.
Key Differences Between AlphaLISA and HTRF
- Detection Principle
- AlphaLISA: Based on proximity-induced chemiluminescence between donor and acceptor beads, leading to a fluorescent signal. The signal is generated by the interaction between singlet oxygen molecules from the donor beads and the chemiluminescent substrate in the acceptor beads.
- HTRF: Utilizes FRET combined with time-resolved fluorescence measurement. The signal is generated through the non-radiative energy transfer from a long-lifetime donor fluorophore to a short-lifetime acceptor fluorophore.
- Signal Generation
- AlphaLISA: The chemiluminescent reaction in the acceptor beads produces a sharp peak of light emission, which can be measured directly.
- HTRF: The donors long lived-fluorescence emission allows for delayed measurement, reducing background fluorescence and improving the signal-to-noise ratio.
- Components
- AlphaLISA: Donor and acceptor beads.
- HTRF: Donor and acceptor fluorophores.
- Wavelength
- AlphaLISA: Typically has a broader emission spectrum due to the nature of the chemiluminescent reaction.
- HTRF: The emission wavelengths are more defined and depend on the specific donor-acceptor pair used.
Applications
- AlphaLISA: Ideal for detecting and quantifying large molecules like proteins and antibodies, especially in complex biological detection, cytokine and growth factor quantification, and for assays where the matrix effect is a concern.
- HTRF: Suited for kinase assays, GPCR studies, and protein-protein interaction studies, particularly when dealing with small molecules or when there is a need to discriminate closely related molecular species. HTRF is also beneficial in assays where rapid kinetics are involved or when studying interactions in live cells.
Advantages
- AlphaLISA: Particularly effective for assays where high sensitivity is required in complex matrices, such as cell lysates, serum, or plasma, due to its robustness against sample interference.
- HTRF: Offers high sensitivity and the ability to measure interactions within a broader range of molecular sizes, including small molecules. The time resolved aspect significantly reduces background fluorescence, enhancing assay sensitivity and dynamic range.
Partner with Us to Find Your Perfect Fit
Choosing between AlphaLISA and HTRF depends on the specific requirements of the assay, including the nature of the analytes, the complexity of the sample matrix, and the need for sensitivity and specificity. AlphaLISA is often preferred for high-sensitivity applications in complex matrices, while HTRF is advantageous for its broad application range, including small molecules studies and real-time kinetic analyses.
Not sure which method is right for you?
Our team at SBH Sciences can help you determine the best approach for your specific assay needs. With our expertise on our BMG LABTECH’s CLARIOstar microplate reader, we can guide you in selecting the optimal method to ensure accurate and reliable results.
Please do not hesitate to contact us to discuss how we can help!
Sources:
https://www.cisbio.eu/content/alphalisa-technology-basics/
SHARE